Elena Pridankina vs Mai Hontama Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 May at 06:41 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Pridankina vs M. Hontama

RUS
1
Win
Played
1
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Pridankina 1 - 1 Hontama
They have played 5 sets in total, with Elena Pridankina winning 2 and Mai Hontama winning 3. The last match between Elena Pridankina and Mai Hontama was at the Jingshan Tennis Open - Jingshan, 22-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Elena Pridankina getting the victory 6-3 6-7(10) 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pridankina | 1 |
| Hontama | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Jingshan Tennis Open - Jingshan(09-22-25)
(Q1) French Open - Paris(05-20-25)
E. Pridankina vs M. Hontama H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $81,600 | Career Prize Money | $635,248 |
| 67.80% (160-76) | Career Total W/L | 58.18% (288-207) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-3) |
E. Pridankina vs M. Hontama Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Pridankina wins 39.27% of second serve points in recent form, while Hontama achieves 40.37%. Does Hontama have a slight edge here?
- Return Game Stats: Pridankina is stronger on second serve returns, winning 53.59% of points compared to Hontama’s 49.86%. However, Hontama surpasses on first serve returns with 36.14% against Pridankina’s 33.53%.
- Under Pressure: Hontama saves 45.87% of breakpoints, slightly better than Pridankina’s 44.2%.
- Overall Match Performance: Over the past year, Pridankina has won 61.64% of matches, while Hontama has managed 43.1%. Is Pridankina favored based on this overall performance?
- Best Surface: Pridankina excels on indoor hard courts (72%), while Hontama's best is on hard courts (61%). Does Pridankina's surface success translate into an advantage?
- Player Level: Pridankina wins 64.62% of matches at the Challengers/ITF level, whereas Hontama wins 43.75%.
- Opponent Quality: Pridankina faces slightly lower-ranked opponents (average rank 268.27) compared to Hontama (average rank 245.19).
- Deciding Sets: Pridankina wins 43% of deciding sets, marginally better than Hontama's 41%.
- Break Point Conversion: Pridankina converts 40.98% of breakpoints, surpassing Hontama's 37.26% efficiency.
Editorial Prediction (May 19, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performances, Pridankina presents an edge in key statistical areas. Her ability to convert breakpoints more efficiently and her strength in returning second serves could heavily influence the match dynamics.
While Hontama slightly outperforms in various pressure scenarios, Pridankina's overall match win percentage over the last year suggests more consistent success at their current event level.
Considering both players' surface preferences, Pridankina's strong performance on indoor hard courts adds weight to her potential victory.
Based on the comparative statistics and recent trends, Pridankina is more likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming match.
Elena Pridankina vs Mai Hontama Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Pridankina vs M. Hontama H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 26 | Games Won | 28 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:12:5 | Average Match Time | 2:12:5 |
| 66% (124/189) | 1st Serve % | 63% (105/167) |
| 57% (71/124) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (71/105) |
| 49% (32/65) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (28/62) |
| 36% (8/22) | Break Pts Won % | 41% (9/22) |
| 41% (68/167) | Return Points Win % | 46% (86/189) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Pridankina Recent Matches Played
M. Hontama Recent Matches Played

E. Pridankina vs M. Hontama Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.80% (160/76) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.18% (288/207) |
| 65.66% (348/182) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.02% (642/484) |
| 57.28% (2716/2026) | Games Win/Loss | 53.29% (5422/4752) |
| 65.45% (72/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.72% (215/145) |
| 69.77% (60/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.57% (30/26) |
| 71.79% (28/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.25% (36/28) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 46.67% (7/8) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 379 | Aces Total | 205 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 731 | Total Double Faults | 1438 |
| 1:34:50 | Average Match Time | 1:31:51 |
| 392.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 430.25 |
| 65% (9442/14549) | 1st Serve % | 67% (20202/30158) |
| 64% (6030/9442) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (11840/20202) |
| 46% (2328/5106) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4506/9942) |
| 50% (1051/2116) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2096/4207) |
| 49% (7286/15014) | Return Points Win % | 48% (14846/30664) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 48.48% (16/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (9/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 80.00% (8/2) |
| 50.00% (7/7) | Main Tour W/L | 47.62% (30/33) |
| 67.24% (117/57) | Challenger W/L | 59.52% (197/134) |
| 81.40% (35/8) | Futures W/L | 70.00% (28/12) |
| 68% (156/230) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (285/487) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 56% (24/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (48/95) |
| 50% (32/64) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (74/142) |
| 89% (163/145) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (281/245) |
| 11% (163/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (281/35) |
| 19% (73/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (214/43) |